Anonymous Patriots

by Our SpiritOctober 28, 20195:50 pm

Hillary Clinton Will Likely Join 2020 Race if Biden Drops Out, Claims Former Adviser

tt dog.JPG

George Washington Has a Message for Patriots

Patriots take action to win the Second American Revolution

AG Bill Barr Defends John Durham Investigation, Praises FBI Director Chris Wray “Outstanding Support”

Barr expects us to believe that Chris Wray is supportive? Bill, we are jaded citizens who are running thin on patience. We know that Wray, Horowitz, and you are Senior Executive Service. We know that SES Bruce Ohr heads up 500+ corrupt DOJ attorneys, all SES lawfare thugs.

Until your Department of Justice shows us some major indictments, week after week, one after the other, We the People say your Department is just running a protection racket for the D.C. criminals, including Christopher Wray and Gina Haspel (you know the CIA chick who was planning the overthrow of Trump with Richard Dearlove and company when she was the CIA station chief in London – no, not Carrie Mathison).

trump isis footage.JPG — View video on tweet

This one is aging nicely.

tt no mercy terrorist.JPG

Hillary Clinton Will Likely Join 2020 Race if Biden Drops Out, Claims Former Adviser

House Democrats to Vote on Impeachment Procedures Thursday

defeat isis.JPG

Europe’s Populist Wave Reaches Portugal

Texas Rep. John Ratcliffe said Sunday that it “is not a coincidence” the investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation morphed into a criminal matter just as the Justice Department’s inspector general is set to release a report of FBI surveillance abuse against the Trump campaign.

John Ratcliffe discusses Durham probe

circle of trust.JPG

tt stock market.JPG

America Doesn’t Need Bad Guys

washington post al baghdadi.JPG

dice go fund me.JPG

phone message

crowd boo trump.JPG — Washington fans boo Trump at World Series

California Fires Spark Massive Mandatory Evacuations; Wineries Burn As Winds Hit 93 MPH

SEE THE AFI CRIMELINE for hard evidence that Hillary Clinton and the State Department were conspiring to subvert agencies of the U.S. government. It is also proof positive that Hillary and the State Department were OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE in the then current LEADER V. FACEBOOK patent infringement case.

Hillary was also conspiring with Facebook to rig elections using Facebook.

This proof alone should put Hillary and State Department officials behind bars.

2009

https://fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/cyber-hijack-findings.html#election-rigging-by-facebook-and-hillary-2009

2010

https://fbcoverup.com/docs/cyberhijack/cyber-hijack-findings.html#election-rigging-by-facebook-and-hillary-2010

Club for Growth President: Utah Republicans ‘Disgusted’ with Mitt Romney on Impeachment

.

baron elijah cummings.JPG

It’s a Congressional Seat, not a Barony

The EU is Rewriting WWII History to Demonize Russia

Slumping Halloween sales spook experts

What kind of parents take their children to attend these events?

drag queen.JPG — Read about this disgusting display of cultural Marxism

AIM Patriot Greg (Australia) wants to make sure that everyone in Australia is aware of this petition. If you reside in Australia, let’s give this patriot some assistance in getting this info some traction.

Greg writes: “The Paris Climate Accord is a vehicle of the globalists with whom we all at ‘war’. Fellow Aussies, Please Sign this Petition to Leave the Paris Agreement
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/10/23/fellow-aussies-please-sign-this-petition-to-leave-the-paris-agreement/

This is a link to an article which provides a link to the actual petition. As of writing there are only about 3000 signatures and it closes 13th November.”

rudolf-steiner

Nothing is more detrimental for the child than acquiring the habit of forming its own judgment at too early an age, before having reached sexual maturity

You are aware that between the 7th and 14th/ 15th year – after which it becomes sexually mature – there lives in the child an ability, that could be described as the power to act on authority. There is nothing better for the child, than to undertake something out of veneration for the person who says: that’s good, that needs to be done. Nothing is more detrimental for the child than acquiring the habit of forming its own judgment at too early an age, before having reached sexual maturity.

In the future, the sense of authority between the 7th and 14th year should be developed much more intensively than in the past. Education in these years will increasingly need to be consciously focused on developing a pure feeling for authority in the child; because what the child acquires in these years, will form the basis for experiencing the equality in the social organism that every person deserves. Equal rights will only arise in this way, because people will never mature as adults towards a feeling for equal rights, when they do not develop a sense for authority during childhood. In the past, a much less strong feeling for authority might have been enough; in the future, it will not be sufficient.

Source (German): Rudolf Steiner – GA 296 -Die Erziehungsfrage als soziale Frage – Dornach, August 9, 1919 (page 19)

Douglas has written a curriculum book for the Wisdom Children that are incarnating in our world. Make sure to download a free copy and guide the children and students in your care to developing their full potential by providing them with a beautiful foundation. See http://www.eternalcurriculum.com

EternalCurriculum_Cover_171006.indd

Presidential Tweets Today

Weapon of Mass Intelligence

American Intelligence Media free app available on Apple and Android. You can also load on to your PC here. Our app is a discreet way to check the day’s headlines and truth news.

We are sorry that we cannot answer all of your emails. Please feel free to leave your questions/comments below in the comment box. We have an amazing AIM4Truth community that can help you if we can’t get a response to you.

Any errors or omissions are inadvertent.

Our YouTube playlists are organized at: AIM4Truth on YouTube

Notices: Unless marked otherwise, American Intelligence Media (AIM), Aim4Truth.org, copyright claims are waived. Reproduction is permitted with or without attribution. This content and its links may contain opinion. As with all opinion, it should not be relied upon without independent verification. Think for yourself. Fair Use is relied upon for all content. For educational purposes only. No claims are made to the properties of third parties.

6Comments

Add yours

1

Eliza Ayres on October 28, 2019 at 6:03 pm

Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal.
2

leepermax on October 28, 2019 at 6:31 pm

Developing:

James Comey Turns

https://youtu.be/DgOk03aXea8
3

linda4light on October 28, 2019 at 7:31 pm

The Comey news made my day! Of course Clinton’s Bitch is now willing to sing like a Canary. I’ve been hoping he’d end up in Gitmo where I pictured him sharing a cell with his buddy Mueller. They could talk about old times while James writes his sequel. My Time in Gitmo, Higher Calling 2. Let’s hope he takes them ALL down with him.
4

Ron Spence on October 28, 2019 at 10:50 pm

RE POTUS Booed:
What a chess move by DJT! Just last week he wanted to know who the never Trumpers were, low and behold a stadium full of them lose all sense of caution, as there are cameras all over the stadium recording their chants and heckles. Looks like there’s gonna be quite a few positions opening up after the secret service identifies the never Trumpers in the crowd!
5

leepermax on October 29, 2019 at 1:30 pm

OAN EXCLUSIVE: Former FBI Official James Baker Flipped, Cooperating With Barr Investigation

https://youtu.be/TV-d-_qEM3Q
6

linda4light on October 30, 2019 at 2:51 pm

The Trial of John Doe VS Censored Jon Rappaport nomorefakenews.com

The trial took place in a quiet empty room, in an underground bunker,
at an undisclosed location in [Censored].

The Judge sat behind a high table. John Doe stood below him.

Judge: You are John Doe? You have a website called Doe Doe?

Doe: Yes, Your Honor. May I know your name?

Judge: Of course. It’s Judge.

Doe: That’s your title.

Judge: It’s also my name.

Doe: You’re Judge Judge?

Judge: Correct. Now, let’s get down to business. You’re the author of an
article you posted on your site. The title of the article was, “A Catalog of
Sexual Assaults and Other Crimes Committed by Migrants in [Censored],
2015-2017.” The subtitle was, “Soaring Migrant Crime Rate Is a National
Disaster—[Censored] Women Fear for Their Safety.”

Doe: Yes.

Judge: How did you assemble this “catalog?”

Doe: I cited articles in the [Censored] press. I obtained access to police
reports in [Censored]. I interviewed over two hundred citizens and their
families. I interviewed law-enforcement officials.

Judge: You traveled to [Censored].

Doe: Correct.

Judge: And as you were exiting the country, you were detained by
[Censored] Customs and Immigration and told your visa was canceled
and you were banned from returning to the country.

Doe: That’s true.

Judge: That’s certainly a black mark against you.

Doe: I don’t see it that way. The government didn’t want me to accumulate
all that information and spread it.

Judge: You’re aware of a foundation called “Anti-Hate-Crime Speech?”

Doe: I am.

Judge: The foundation was formed by GoogleFacebookTwitterYouTubeFooFooShooShooAmazonStarbucks
MerckTheCIAFoundationForBetterLiving and 167 other groups.

Doe: So I understand.

Judge: And several of those groups canceled your donation account, de-monetized your videos, deleted your site from six search engines, and convinced a local delivery service to stop bringing pizza to your house.

Doe: Right.

Judge: You’re accused of hate speech against immigrants.

Doe: I published facts. I wasn’t speaking against anyone off the cuff.

Judge: But that’s how it was interpreted. Your article was incendiary, because it inspired a negative view of immigration.

Doe: Inspired? I wrote facts. How others took those facts was their business.

Judge: It’s a question of the greater good. Exposing a few cases of wrongdoing versus alarming and biasing a whole population.

Doe: There is another element. Suppressing important information. Keeping people from seeing what’s happening to their communities and their nation.

Judge: Hate speech cannot be tolerated.

Doe: Who says it’s hate speech?

Judge: A non-profit in Alabama. Two media outlets. They’ve been hired by the Anti-Hate-Crime Speech Foundation to scour articles and identify hate.

Doe: Well, they’re wrong.

Judge: They can’t be wrong.

Doe: Why not?

Judge: Because they’re authorities.

Doe: According to whom?

Judge: These groups are setting a standard. Someone has to.

Doe: How about someone else setting a standard?

Judge: Who would that be?

Doe: The point is, I was exercising my 1st Amendment rights.

Judge: Your what?

Doe: I have a right to speak and write.

Judge: Not if it upsets the good order of the community and causes suffering on the part of people associated with those you accuse of committing serious crimes.

Doe: I disagree. And why shouldn’t I disturb “the good order” if the order is ill-advised and based on the fear of speaking out?

Judge: Let me explain something, Mr. Doe. You have created a generality of hatred.

Doe: A what?

Judge: By publishing your article, you created a generality of negative reaction against a whole group.

Doe: I reported facts, not generalities.

Judge: What you reported can’t be divorced from the effect it had on other people.

Doe: Of course it can. My work didn’t have an automatic effect on other people. They inferred whatever they inferred from my article.

Judge: The overriding principle is: everything is connected to everything.

Doe: You lost me there, sir.

Judge: Everyone in this world is connected and interdependent. Therefore, whatever you do spreads like ink on a blotter.

Doe: How can that be? I gathered specific facts. Those facts don’t apply to all people.

Judge: That’s the old view of things. Now we know that all of us are together as One. A charge against a few is a charge against many.

Doe: That’s illogical. It’s also dangerous. If what you’re saying were true, no one could speak out…

Judge: But you see, there is an important exception to the general rule. I have a list of groups. Certain groups are protected against accusation or slander. Other groups may be accused. In fact, they must be accused.

Doe: Where did you get the list?

Judge: From our leaders.

Doe: Our who?

Judge: Leaders. The people who have knowledge of these matters. The people who understand history. The people who are—

Doe: I see. I exposed certain members of a group that can’t be accused.

Judge: Correct.

Doe: This is over-complicated. I come back to the principle of free speech.

Judge: There is no such principle. At one time, there may have been, but not anymore.

Doe: You’re losing me again, sir.

Judge: It’s quite simple, really.

At this point, six men in black masks holding rifles and burning torches entered the room. One of the men said, “This proceeding is over. We are [Censored]. We have taken the sacred oath of [Censored]. We are cells of the body of the Soros.

Judge: Welcome. Was your oath the [Censored]?

Masked Man: Yes.

Judge: I, too, have taken the oath of the [Censored]. We are One. What message do you bring?

Masked Man: Our leader instructs us to tell you that the defendant, John Doe, is to be sentenced to six days without food or water in the burning desert of [Censored], after which he will be transported to a re-education camp in [Censored], where he will undergo a one-year period of [Censored]. This is the Word.

Judge: I see. Very well. My sentence is thusly made.

Doe: You take orders from these men, Your Honor?

Judge: These men and I are not separate. We are One.

Doe: How did that happen?

Judge: Once upon a time, we were losers. Now we are winners. We overthrew the old order and instituted a new one.

Doe: That must have taken a great deal of planning.

Judge: Decades. More.

Doe: Why haven’t I heard about it?

Judge: Because you are one of those people who would have tried to expose our agenda. Suffice it to say, we worked in secret. We introduced chaos. As just one strategy of many, and I only mention it because it’s one of my favorites, we introduced, into the culture, a long series of absurd rulings and situations that defy logic and rationality. Such rulings paralyze the mind. The mind retreats. It becomes passive. Quiescent. A grandmother grows vegetables on her lawn. She is hauled into court and prosecuted for defacing the appearance of the neighborhood. A child brings a pastry to school and bites it into the shape of what might look like a gun. The child is suspended. Colleges offer rooms with dolls and hot chocolate to students who are triggered by a pronoun. A college student council decides that all white people are demons and must be excluded from decision-making roles. A four-year-old child is encouraged to talk with his parents about the child’s “choice” to change his gender. A manual used by elementary school teachers suggests discussions on all possible forms of sexual intercourse, even sex with animals. Parents are told their vaccinated children are protected from disease, but must not play with unvaccinated children, because then they could get sick, even though they are protected. A state which is in debt to the tune of half a trillion dollars proposes accepting immigrants without limit and giving them many government services without charge. Any politician who speaks with a Russian faces a potential charge of trading with the enemy. Do I need to go on? Over time, one fantastic and absurd thing after another is piled up upon the consciousness of the public, until the insanity reaches to the sky. What is the effect of all that? The befuddled public surrenders and becomes passive. And then we come in behind that and impose our agenda.

Masked Man: Enough. We will remove the defendant now and take him to [Censored].

Judge: Of course.

Doe: So I’m not really guilty.

Judge: You are what we say you are. That overrides all questions of guilt or innocence. There is no more guilt or innocence. There are only rulings. For centuries, guilt and innocence have been twisted by men in power to suit their own ends. We have stopped that. We have stopped the corruption. Now we make decisions based on the greater good. We are the pure ones. We have no agenda except service to the people.

Doe: You’re destroyers.

Judge: “We had to destroy the village in order to save it.”

Doe: You’re going to lose.

Judge: Why is that, Mr. Doe?

Doe: You’ll go too far. You have no idea what people will do when you put them against the wall. That passivity you spoke of is going to evaporate.

Judge: We will see. We will see.

Doe: Are you even human?

Judge: Of course I am. Do you think I’m AI android number 3012-6-B, third generation, extruded at Factory [Censored], produced by [Censored] in
accordance with regulations under the [Censored] code of [Censored]…?.

·Comments are closed.