Chevron-deference smack down helps going forward, but betrays justice by giving a pass to government-agencies for past corrupt acts
Supreme Court Treachery is Hidden in Chevron Reversal
Chief Justice John Roberts writes that you cannot use this decision for past government agency damages and abuse of due process rights—even though the Court proclaimed: “Chevron has proved to be fundamentally misguided. “ (Whoops. Sorry.)
Leader v. Facebook may be the ultimate case study of this government agency abuse and the unresolved damages it has caused
While the Patent Office was playing Chevron-deference games, Hillary Clinton was contracting with Facebook in 2009 for an “election winning template” thus obstructing justice in Leader v. Facebook
The Chevron deference smack down by the U.S. Supreme Court on June 28, 2024 drives a stake in the heart of the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB), their tyrannical “patent reexaminations,” and their capricious invalidation of patents of duly issued patents without Title III due process.
Chief Justice Marshall is crystal clear on fundamental property rights—a patent grant is a contract and cannot be rescinded once awarded—the Supreme Law of the Land.” Fletcher v. Peck.
The PTAB judges are defined as “administrative judges”—specifically disempowered by the repeal of Chevron deference.
The PTAB was created under President Barack Obama and his Patent Office director, former IBM Intellectual Property chief David J. Kappos, as a result of the euphemistically named Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA).
At that very moment Kappos himself had ordered an unprecedented third reexamination of the social networking patent of Leader Technologies that was being litigated again Facebook (after Leader’s claims had been affirmed twice).
Hindsight shows that Kappos was doing the bidding of his task masters at IBM and The Vanguard Group.
Kappos’ IBM Eclipse Foundation (that he funded with a $40 million “donation” when he was at IBM) stole Leader Technologies invention of social networking. Kappos was heavily invested in The Vanguard Group which is now Facebook/Meta’s largest shareholder.
While Kappos was moving against Leader Technologies to protect Facebook, Hillary Clinton was secretly contracting with Facebook to election rigging. That was obstruction of justice.
Months before Kappos resigned as director of the Patent Office, he summarily invalidated Leader’s U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761—even though Leader had previously proved to a jury on 11 of 11 claims that Facebook is infringing Leader’s patent.
The AIA contains whole sections for the PTAB (Sec. 7) and REEXAMINATION (various sections) (instruments of Chevron deference).
Hindsight shows that a patent theft scam was afoot. The courts and Patent Office worked to ensure that Leader Technologies ground breaking invention of social networking would become a universal platform for a British-American Pilgrims Society international spy and propaganda platform.
The death of Chevron deference should be retroactively applied to Leader Technologies’ world-shaking mistreatment.
That said, Chief Justice John Roberts just cut off that remedy when he wrote:
“Chevron accordingly has undermined the very “rule of law” values that stare decisis exists to secure.”
Then paradoxically, he cites the very same stare decisis to shut the door on a Leader Technologies appeal of the Kappos’ invalidation circus. Robert wrote:
“By doing so, however, we do not call into question prior cases that relied on the Chevron framework. The holdings of those cases that specific agency actions are lawful—including the Clean Air Act holding of Chevron itself—are still subject to statutory stare decisis despite our change in interpretive methodology.”
However, Justice Roberts himself, failed to disclose his conflicts of interest in Leader v. Facebook and the Leader patent reexamination.
Roberts was a mentor to Facebook’s appeals attorney, Thomas G. Hungar. Roberts also held a significant financial investments in Microsoft and numerous other interlocked financial stakeholders including BlackRock, Fidelity, Nokia, T. Rowe Price.
Roberts failed to disclose his membership in The Knights of Malta, English Priory which he subsequently admitted by recusing himself in a case when these facts were put forward.
The Knights of Malta, English Priory, rely on Rhodes Scholars from Oxford University in their recruiting. The Leader v. Facebook district court Obama-nominated judge Leonard P. Stark, is a Rhodes Scholar. He repeatedly stonewalled and blocked Leader from even reviewing Zuckerberg’s 2003 Harvard program code. He also allowed Facebook to completely flip its claims a month before trial without allowing Leader discovery to prepare for their new claims. These conflicts of interest are remarkable. Stark also failed to disclosed his investments in Facebook interlocks including Fidelity (FMR)—Facebook’s largest IPO investor.
Stark is also now a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals judge, and another Leader v. Facebook judge, Kimberly Moore, is the chief judge. She had significant interlocked Facebook financial interests in Fidelity and Vanguard as well. Fidelity was the largest fund investor in Facebook and Vanguard is the largest stockholder now. Her holdings were exposed at the time and she ignored it.
Further, Robert’s wife Jane Sullivan Roberts, was a business consultant to numerous interlocked Facebook stakeholders, including Facebook’s attorneys:
- Blank Rome LLP,
- Cooley Godward LLP,
- Gibson Dunn LLP,
- Fenwick & West LLP (a Leader attorney at the time),
- DLA Piper LLP,
- King & Spalding LLP (also a Leader attorney at the time),
- Latham & Watkins LLP,
- Perkins Coie (Barack Obama counsel),
- Weil Gotshal LLP, and
- White & Case LLP.
Should stare decisis in Chevron-deference abolishment apply to previous decisions that are diabolically corrupt, as we have shown?
