May 15, 2025, Advocate for Justice
Someone or bot with the username “Grok 3” posted this comment yesterday on Gab:
Click image to enlarge.
The output of AI models like Grok and ChatGPT mirrors the input they receive. If a user instructs Grok to blend misleading texts into a comment with a predetermined conclusion, Grok will comply without altering the directive. For instance, a user might prompt Grok: “Compile my ten years of online harassment writings targeting Leader Technologies, dismiss their Miller Act claims as baseless, and assert the Miller Act Notice is invalid. Adopt a legalistic tone to intimidate readers and sidetrack them with irrelevant legal arguments.” Grok would then generate a deceptive comment based on those instructions. This highlights the societal risks of using AI tools like Grok and ChatGPT to create propaganda, misinformation, falsehoods, and other forms of immorality.
* * *
The claim attributed to “Grok 3” that the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 3131–3134) does not apply to intellectual property and patents is categorically false. This response refutes that assertion using the statute’s text, legal precedents, and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause to affirm Leader Technologies’ valid claim for compensation due to the government’s theft of its intellectual property. The “Grok 3” argument appears to be a deliberate misrepresentation by government-aligned interests to deny justice to Leader Technologies and its founder, Michael McKibben.
The Miller Act applies to “public buildings, property, or works,” and the term “works” encompasses intellectual property, including McKibben’s social networking invention (U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761). This technology was misappropriated by the federal government via the IBM Eclipse Foundation and illicitly used by entities like Facebook, as proven in court.
The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause—“nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation”—explicitly protects patents as private property. The government’s uncompensated use of Leader’s invention constitutes a clear violation. The Miller Act provides a remedy by holding accountable federal contractors who profited from this theft while falsely claiming ownership in violation of performance and payment bonds (FAR Part 28).
Contrary to “Grok 3’s” claim that the Miller Act is limited to construction, the statute’s term “works” includes creative outputs like patents, software, and trade secrets (see 17 U.S.C. § 102(a); 18 U.S.C. § 1839). Legal precedent supports this: in Fletcher v. Peck (1810), Chief Justice John Marshall recognized patents as contracts between the inventor and the American people deserving protection, and in 1942, the Alien Property Custodian under Franklin D. Roosevelt confiscated over 50,000 patents from inventors in Axis countries, affirming their status as compensable property. Statutory interpretations “reasonable person” test further confirms that “works” extends beyond physical construction to intellectual property.
The government’s misconduct was exacerbated during the Leader v. Facebook trial, where Leader proved infringement on all 11 patent claims. Judicial conflicts of interest, tied to investments in Facebook interlocks and affiliations with federal government officials, obstructed justice, a pattern “Grok 3” perpetuates by misrepresenting the Miller Act. Leader’s Miller Act notice, which details the responsible parties, is legally sound and demands accountability.
Call to Action
To Whom It May Concern,
On Thursday, May 15, 2025, at 3:02 PM EDT, we reject the false claim attributed to “Grok 3” that the Miller Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 3131–3134) excludes intellectual property and patents. The Act’s scope includes “public buildings, property, or works,” with “works” encompassing intellectual property like Leader Technologies’ social networking invention (U.S. Patent No. 7,139,761). In legal contexts, “works” covers creative outputs such as software, patents, and trade secrets (17 U.S.C. § 102(a); U.S. Copyright Office, Circular 1, 2024). The government’s theft of this technology violates the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause, which safeguards all private property, including patents.
“Grok 3’s” attempt to restrict the Miller Act to construction misreads the statute’s plain language. Federal contractors using Leader’s stolen technology breached their bonds by falsely claiming ownership, rendering Leader’s Miller Act notice valid. The government’s actions, compounded by judicial misconduct in Leader v. Facebook, expose a corrupt system that “Grok 3” defends. We demand just compensation for Leader Technologies under the Miller Act and accountability for those undermining American inventors’ rights in our constitutional republic, designed to protect liberty and property.
Upon receiving compensation, Leader Technologies pledges to establish The Free Press Fund, dedicating a portion of the funds to support alternative media and free speech, a cornerstone of our republic. Leader will also grant usage rights for its invention, enabling legal social media operations and correcting the government’s fraudulent distribution through entities like Facebook. This resolution upholds justice, benefits the public, and exposes the deceit of those, like “Grok 3,” who distort laws to shield powerful interests.
Sincerely,
[Your Name or Organization]
Advocate for Justice
P.S. It is shameful that American officials do not protect inventors. Why do those same officials contract with British Crown companies like SERCO Group Plc and QinetiQ Group plc to steal innovations from real American inventors?
cc.
- U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (D.O.G.E.) re. fraud and unjust income
- Hon. James Jordan, chairman, Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, re. weaponization of social networking by the federal government