Our researchers have been through the Strzok testimony and these are their findings of relevance. If you see additional items that need to be pointed out, please leave them in the comment box below.
Conclusion of the Strzok Interview Analysis:
1. The FBI refused to answer most any question about the time frame surrounding Dinner with the Ohrs, or contact with the Ohrs.
They were tap dancing about any activities in the May-Jun time frame or the run up to the first FISA warrant application.
Specifically, they tap danced about whether admitted FBI “Supervisor” Strzok was the agent who signed off on the first Carter Page Warrant application.
- The “sensitive source” appears to have been the Chief Crown Prosecutor Alison Saunders, the special home dinner guest of Bruce & Nellie Ohr.
- Strzok travelled to London in May 2016, most likely to make all the entrapment arrangements with Chief Crown Prosecutor Alison Saunders and her minions Stefan Halper and Sir Richard Dearlove to frame the two patsies George Papadopoulos and Carter Page who had the most Russian contacts they could muster who had had cursory contacts with the Trump campaign.
Here is the testimony transcript that is referenced throughout this post:
Peter Strzok. (Jun. 27, 2018). Peter Strzok TRANSCRIPTION of Interview with Peter Strzok released by Rep. Doug Collins (GA 9th), Committee on the Judiciary, pgs. 312. U.S. House of Representatives.
Too many words… Protecting “Dinner with the Ohrs” and Crown Prosecution Service chief Alison Saunders? Remember, the FISA warrant request in June 2016 and they were busy revising it for the first approval in October 2016
Predicating information was probably “Dinner with the Ohrs” and British prosecutor Alison Saunders.
See below… “easily answered…” Yes?
After the first FISA Carter Page warrant was issued, likely triggered by “Dinner with the Ohrs” on June 5, 2016
First Carter W. Page FISA warrant was applied for in “June 2016” and issued in “October 2016).
Crossfire Hurricane is the probe code name.
Strzok is tap dancing…
Is the “UK” redacted in the transcripts below?
Side bar: This item from The Hill that reported trips to London:
Strzok tap shoes back on…
p. 54
More tap dancing…
More hiding behind secrecy skirts.
Strzok testimony protected SES identities! Nobody in Congress pushed back!
This is an ignorant answer. If this were true then there would be no need to keep conflict of interest logs, FEC disclosures, SEC disclosure or have ethics rules on conflicts.
More proof he set up Carter Page and George Papadopoulos with the Queen’s assistance (Alison Saunders)
Back to the tap dancing…
Not answering is a YES!
Perjury:
…but remember it is LEGAL TO LIE TO CONGRESS