Best way to understand this post is to listen to Michael McKibben and Douglas Gabriel tell you what they found in the mines. Then all the evidence we have for you below video will make sense.
Be an information warrior and get this out through your network wide and far. We must stop these criminals from destroying the United States of America and the world.
Rosenstein’s appointment of Mueller was based on a Fidelity-Clinton concealed relationship
Mueller’s Judge Amy Berman Jackson, Justice Roberts, Rod Rosenstein, James Comey are all heavily invested in Fidelity
MUELLER’S JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR TAKE THEIR ORDERS FROM HILLARY
THEY USED INVISIBLE TEXT TO HIDE THE CONNECTION!
The Clinton Foundation’s 2017 IRS Form 9090 hides a $1,000,550 Fidelity donation
Rosenstein, Jackson, Stark, Comey & Roberts all hold substantial Fidelity $$$ investments
No DOJ official with Fidelity holdings should be involved in any matter related to Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation—this circumstance screams “RIGGED!”
This discovery of Rosenstein’s Fidelity holdings makes his appointment of Mueller (he should have recused himself along with Jeff Sessions) as special prosecutor a fraud
Chief Justice John Roberts has been silent about this obvious conflict of interest that makes the entire Mueller investigation invalid
(FEB. 04, 2019)—Theoretically, district courts randomly assign judges using a master calendar, prescreening, or some combination. With so many options and essentially no oversight from Chief Justice John Roberts, the process in high profile cases is fraught with corruption.
JACKSON’S MANY SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) SHADOW GOVERNMENT COMPANIONS
Judge Boasberg, holding up to $7 million in investments in 2012, is heavily invested in Clinton Foundation donors, as is Jackson shown below (incl. Berkshire Hathaway, Microsoft, State Street, T. Rowe Price, Vanguard, Cisco, Fidelity, Intel, Johnson & Johnson, Linear Technology, Medtronic, Procter & Gamble, Walgreens, Wells Fargo, Western Union).
Reggie B. Walton approved that the incoming attorney general Eric H. Holder, Jr. could unilaterally approve FISA surveillance on Americans without oversight by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
In short, FISA judge James E. Boasberg is a 1%-er. See previous post Eric Holder Exploits Secret FISA Laws.
On Dec. 12, 2008, Judge Reggie Walton modified the FISA law to give incoming attorney general Eric H. Holder, Jr. essentially dictatorial powers over Constitutional protections to privacy and property.
Judge Boasberg never met an FBI request from Robert Mueller, Eric Holder and James Comey to spy on an American that he did not like.
Boasberg hails from Yale’s Skull & Bones (along with the two George Bushes, John Kerry) and from Oxford University’s & Cecil Rhodes’ one-world schoolhouse for the takedown of the American Republic (along with Sir Geoffrey E. Pattie, Lord Mark Malloch-Brown, Sir Nicholas P. Clegg, Lord Richard B. Allan, the Privy Council). See previous post Eric Holder exploits secret FISA laws for personal gain.
JACKSON’S ‘RANDOM’ ASSIGNMENT TO MUELLER CASES IS MAGICAL
Judge Amy B. Jackson was just assigned to Roger Stone’s case on Jan. 24, 2019. Magically, Jackson was also (randomly?) assigned to the Mueller prosecutions of Paul Manafort, Rick Gates and Skadden Arps LLP lawyer Alex Rolf van der Zwaan.
SKADDEN ARPS LLP – A GO TO FIRM FOR SHADOW GOVERNMENT FIXERS
Speaking of Skadden Arps LLP, Hillary Clinton’s chief of staff, Christina M. Tchen (2011-2017), and Delaware district court judge Leonard P. Stark (Obama appointed in 2010, Leader v. Facebook2010) were both partners at the woefully corrupt Skadden Arps LLP law firm. See previous posts [VIDEOS] The Weaponization of Social Media Should Concern Us All & Leader files trillion dollar bond lien on the U.S. Government(for the theft of their social networking invention).
GLARING SHIFT OF JACKSON’S INVESTMENT HOLDINGS BETWEEN 2009 AND 2012
AFI and AIM researchers discovered a massive shift from 2009 to 2012 in the structure of Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s financial portfolio. See Alert.
In 2009, Jackson disclosed 169 holdings of which approximately 85 were private company stocks and 84 were mutual funds.
Jackson’s 85 private stock holdings included:
In 2012, however, a dramatic shift occurred. Jackson reported only 44 holdings—a 74% drop in number of holdings. Also notable was that the holdings were all institutional and mutual funds—no private company stocks.
DID JACKSON LOSE FAITH IN HER ‘BLUE CHIP’ INVESTMENTS? NO.
A reasonable person will ask why Jackson dumped all her Blue Chip stocks.
Or did she?
Remarkably, at least 31 of her 2009 holdings in Blue Chip corporate stocks were in donors to The Clinton Foundation (The New York Times list).
See also Vox list. See also Sep. 14, 2009 Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) Participants and Agenda; Sep. 16, 2010 Clinton Global Initiative Participant Commitment Highlights; Guccifer 2.0 List; Speech Fees donated by Companies to The Clinton Foundation. Also, google “NAME” AND “CLINTON FOUNDATION” to discover other relationships.
The companies in bold below are notoriously known donors to The Clinton Foundation by its more than 35 different names.
In other words, these are companies with knownClinton Foundation relationships—that Jackson held in 2009—disappeared in her 2012 financial disclosure.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s holdings in Clinton Foundation donors in 2009 (out of her private stock holdings):
QUESTION: Where did Jackson’s holdings in these Blue Chip private companies go by 2012?
ANSWER: She simply buried them inside crony mutual funds who were, or became, heavily invested in her favorite companies. This gave her the continuing benefit of those profits while hiding their relationship to the Clinton Foundation.
For example: Jackson disclosed a substantial holding in AMG Yachtman I (YACKX) of up to $250,000 in their Dec. 31, 2017 FORM N-CSR Annual Report to Shareholders (SEC Edgar HTML). PDF Version.
While the AMG Yachtman I fund does not appear to have a direct relationship with The Clinton Foundation, its portfolio holdings, officers, bankers and trustees do . . . massively.
In other words, Jackson’s 2009 private company stock holdings in Clinton Foundation donors comprise about 80% of all holdings in AMG Yachtman I fund in 2012 alone.
And, AMG Yachtman I is just one (1) of Jackson’s 44 holdings reported in 2012. Indeed, despite any excuse like the “safe harbor” concept, Berman has an ethical duty in Canon 3 to disclose these conflicts.
In addition, the AMG Yachtman I (YACKX) Trustees and Officers consist of other known Clinton Foundationdonors and operatives, specifically:
Of the 31 Blue Chip private stocks Berman sold between 2009 and 2012, the following holdings in bold represent significant portions of the AMG Yachtman I (YACKX) current portfolio:
WE ARE JUST WARMING UP ON JUDGE JACKSON’S EGREGIOUS CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN THE MUELLER PROBE
Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to recuse if their involvement raises even the appearance of impropriety. Canon 3 requires recusal when the judge holds “even one share” in stock of an interested party in a litigation.
Jackson has layers of conflicts of interest in violation of multiple Canons in matters related to Robert Mueller and Hillary Clinton:
- Judge Amy Berman Jackson has permitted her long-time former law partners from Trout Cacheris LLP, Robert Trout and Gloria B. Solomon, to represent parties in the Mueller matters. The appearance of impropriety and conspiracy with Mueller’s political agenda is evident.
- Judge Amy Berman Jackson holds direct financial interests in at least three institutions (and probably more if we kept digging) who are notoriously-known donors to The Clinton Foundation (four Fidelity funds, two Capital Oneand two Vanguard funds). This is blatant, in your face impropriety requiring recusal.
The following persons associated with the Mueller investigation hold Fidelity stocks: Judge Amy Berman Jackson (4 holdings), Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.(17 holdings), Leonard P. Stark (7 holdings), James B. Comey (2 holdings), Rod J. Rosenstein (18 holdings). This is prima facie (on its face) evidence that they are conflicted in all matters involving Hillary
Clinton Foundation. (Nov. 07, 2018). FIDELITY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND (hidden, but retrievable), $1,000,550, PDF p. 57, Form 990 Return of Organization From Income Tax, certified by Andrew Kessel, CFO, Cohnreznick LLP, accessed from The Clinton Foundation Website Feb. 07, 2018. The Clinton Foundation.
- Judge Amy Berman Jackson concealed about 85 holdings in corporate stocks in 2009 by shifting them into 44 mutual funds that hold those stocks (and other Clinton Foundation interested parties) in 2012.While Jackson may have relied upon the dubious “safe harbor” “concept” (Judicial Conference scrambling of the financial disclosure rules in 2001) by disclosing only the fund name and not its underlying stock holdings, not even that concept applies here since three of her holdings are in Fidelity, Capital One and Vanguard that are notoriously known Clinton Foundation donors.
- Much worse is the fact that approximately 43% of the “top ten” largest corporate stock holdings in her 44 mutual funds are notoriously known donors to The Clinton Foundation and its 35 related entities.
PROSECUTOR JEANNIE S. RHEE IS A WILMERHALE HACK
Mueller’s go-to prosecutor in 36 cases is Jeannie S. Rhee. The majority of these cases are against Russians whose names appear suspiciously fabricated. Her biography shows that since Yale Law school she has only had jobs in and out of the Department of Justice and WilmerHale-Comey-Mueller.
Judge Amy Berman Jackson cannot possibly avoid the requirement to recuse herself immediately from the Mueller cases due to her conflicts of interest both with Mueller and with Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.
If she does not, the she obliterates even the semblance of judicial impartiality that is embodied in the Code of Conduct for Federal Judges—a Code she pledged an oath to uphold.
JUDGE AMY B. JACKSON MUST RECUSE HERSELF FROM THE MUELLER CASES IMMEDIATELY
Every American patriot should storm the gates of government and demand Judge Jackson’s recusal. Even if they don’t, anything she does must be thrown out because her continuing presence means everything that occurs is “the fruit of the poisonous tree.”
* * *