Mueller Report says grand juries are not accountable to the government or We The People
Mueller cited a 1992 case he pushed along with an eventual FISA presiding judge and an SES DoJ paymaster allowing prosecutors to withhold exculpatory evidence from grand juries
Mueller used this case to justify withholding evidence in the Trump-Russia investigation
DoJ and Judiciary have become lawless. Grand juries must be abolished
(MAY 01, 2019)—The Mueller Report (Vol. I, p. 177, ¶ iii) made a shocking claim that the U.S. grand jury system . . .
“belongs to no branch of Government and the people” citing U.S. v. Williams (1992).
Researchers found this claim preposterous in light of the U.S. Constitution in which We the People bestow all powers to the government. No grand jury can operate alongside or outside of We the People in our Republic. To read such a claim from a man who was director of the FBI for more than a decade implies that everything he built at the FBI is a house built on shifting sand. See Jesus’ Parable of the Wise and the Foolish Builder.
Our investigation into Mueller’s use of the Williams case has uncovered decades of sin and misconduct within the Department of Justice and Judiciary.
Mueller helped write the Williams case. He uses his own 1992 case to justify withholding massive “exculpatory evidence” (favorable to President Trump) of the real Hillary Clinton conspiracies with Russia surrounding Uranium One.
On Apr. 20, 2009, as FBI director, Mueller himself delivered a ten-gram sample of highly-enriched yellow cake uranium to Vladimir Putin on the Moscow Sheremetyevo Airport tarmac. This was proven by leaked State Department cables where Hillary as the newly-appointed Secretary of State directed the uranium transfer (“We require that the transfer of this material [by FBI Director Mueller] be conducted at the airport, on the tarmac near by the plane, upon arrival of the Director’s aircraft”).
Compare this real Russian collusion to the faked pee pee dossier. The contrast is obscene.
By relying on Williams to withhold evidence, Mueller played his long held trump card, no pun intended, and proved he should have recused himself due to the appearance of impropriety as an author of the bogus Williams opinion on which he now relies.
Further investigation into Williams reveals a decades-long pattern of corrupt practices with the FBI, Department of Justice and the Judiciary surrounding grand juries, which have clearly been Senior Executive Service (SES) shadow government kangaroo courts.
Hindsight shows that Mueller has used Williams to withhold evidence from other grand juries before—Ruby Ridge (1992), Waco (1993), World Trade Center (1993), Oklahoma City Bombing (1995), 9/11 (2001) and now the Trump-Russia Hoax. The pattern is clear. False Flag events are covered up by rigged grand juries.
MUELLER RIGGED GRAND JURIES STARTING IN 1992
The Supreme Court in Williams ruled along political lines that a DoJ special prosecutor could withhold “exculpatory evidence” and persecute innocent victims. Justice Stevens dissented saying “[I]t blinks reality to say that the grand jury can adequately perform this important historic role if it is intentionally misled by the prosecutor. PDF p. 33 (p. 68).
The original case against entrepreneur investor John H. Williams, Jr. was contrived by the DoJ from the start. The fact that it made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court is a testament to a conspiracy between the DoJ and Judiciary to get the precedent they wanted.
Williams was accused by then Associate U.S. Attorney Frank Keating (no relation to the S&L Keating in AZ) of bank fraud in Tulsa OK for allegedly overvaluing two venture capital stock assets shown on his financial statement for a loan application. Keating’s brother Daniel Keating was the bank president at Village South National Bank. Daniel had approached his brother Frank to take the case so he could lower his legal costs. He said “I didn’t in my mind consider this a criminal case.” Clearly, his brother and the DoJ saw an opportunity to use the case for their nefarious purpose.
Frank Keating indicted Williams and withheld substantial audit evidence that proved Williams was innocent (other audits listing the stocks) and had no intent to defraud. The district court judge James O. Ellison agreed and threw out the case, stating the “information withheld raises reasonable doubt about the Defendant’s intent to defraud” and this “renders the grand jury’s decision to indict gravely suspect.” Williams, PDF, p. 35.
In a reasonable world, this should have been the end of the Williams case. The fact that the DoJ pursued the case to the U.S. Supreme Court anyway turns our attention to the DoJ and Judiciary motives to make precedent case law out of Williams.
Preposterously, the DoJ insisted that prosecutors should be free to withhold evidence of a target’s innocence from a grand jury.
On appeal to the Tenth Circuit, the circuit too agreed with the district court and rejected the government’s argument.
SO, WHY TAKE WILLIAMS TO THE SUPREME COURT UNLESS YOU WANT TO RIG GRAND JURIES WITH PREDETERMINED OUTCOMES?
The DoJ filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. They argued that a special prosecutor was not required to disclose exculpatory evidence. The court’s decision was sharply split.
The 5:4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings, but Mueller had his sound byte (and used it in his Report).
That’s where this trail went ice cold.
Tellingly, the whole Williams district court docket is missing.
The district court docket has been removed. Zilch. Nada. None of the district court records are available in either Pacer or LEXIS NEXIS. Other records in other cases at that time are there, but not Williams. This is all the more concerning because it would include the records of the case after it came back from the Supreme Court for further consideration on the firm evidence that the special prosecutor had withheld from the grand jury.
The first telltale sign of DoJ and Judicial misconduct at the U.S. Supreme Court are the government attorneys who argue the case:
(1) Kenneth R. Starr,
(2) Robert S. Mueller, III,
(3) William C. Bryson and
(4) Michael R. Dreeben.
The evident result of Mueller et al’s argument is the blessing of the Supreme Court for prosecutors to withhold evidence from a grand jury in order to create fake indictments. As stated earlier, history shows that is what he did after Ruby Ridge (1992), Waco (1993), World Trade Center (1993), Oklahoma City Bombing (1995), 9/11 and now Trump Russia Hoax (2017).
Here is where the relationships among Mueller and the other U.S. Attorneys in the Williams case get highly suspect.
OKLAHOMA GOV. FRANK KEATING
Frank Keating, the original grand jury prosecutor and the brother of the bank manager pressing charges against Williams, became governor of Oklahoma. Keating presided over the Oklahoma City Bombing false flag in which Timothy McVeigh, a now known C.I.A. asset and mind control drone of Dr. Jolly West, was framed.
Never mind that a Clinton body guard, Alan G. Whicher, was killed in the blast, or that the FBI investigation records for Ruby Ridge and Waco were destroyed or carted off before to first responders were allowed into the rubble, or that the actual bomb materials were DoD weapons-grade and could not have been the low energy made-for-TV fertilizer truck bomb. See testimony of Ted L. Gunderson, FBI Agent in Charge.
The McVeigh trial, following a grand jury indictment, (filed Feb. 20, 1996) was transferred out of Oklahoma where former U.S. Attorney and U.S. v. Williams lead Frank Keating was now governor. Keating’s former U.S. Attorney colleague Joseph C. Wyderko was assigned the McVeigh case.
U.S. ATTORNEY JOSEPH C. WYDERKO
Concurrent with Wyderko’s assignment to the McVeigh grand jury and trial, the DoJ began assigning him to numerous cases with U.S. Attorney Michael R. Dreeben. For example, Dreeben and Wyderko were concurrently assigned to a Supreme Court case U.S. v. O’Hagan, Case No. 96-842 (Oct. 1996 term).
Tellingly, about the same time, on Oct. 11, 1996, Congress passed three Acts simultaneously, the Economic Espionage Act, the Federal Trade Secrets Act and the False Statements Accountability Act (“FSAA”). Those laws were written largely by James P. Chandler, III and were enthusiastically promoted by President Bill Clinton, Robert S. Mueller, III, James B. Comey, DoJ, FBI and intelligence, among others.
The assignment of Wyderko to another Dreeben case would effectively muzzle Wyderko from ever talking about his conversations with Dreeben about the McVeign case. This was evident insurance, just in case Wyderko was ever tempted to spill the beans on the government’s framing of McVeigh, including withholding of exculpatory evidence. Case confidentiality rules would silence him.
Consistent with the result of U.S. v. Williams (special prosecutors can lie to grand jurys), the FSAA, subsection (b) permitted lying to courts and Congressby these same prosecutors.
Now, let’s move forward in time to the Robert Mueller Special Prosecutor legal team, sometimes called “The 13 Angry Democrats.”
U.S. ATTORNEY MICHAEL R. DREEBEN—SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE (SES) PAYMASTER
Michael R. Dreeben, Wyderko’s and Mueller’s DoJ colleague who has relied on Williams in many grand jury cases, was appointed by Mueller to the Special Counsel team in 2017. Evidently, Mueller needed insiders who were familiar with Williams and would keep their mouths shut about withheld exculpatory evidence.
The close Dreeben-Wyderko relationship implicates Mueller in withholding evidence in the Oklahoma City Bombing, and in complicity with Oklahoma Governor Frank Keating in the staging of the U.S. v. Williamscase and his framing of McVeigh in the OK bombing as well.
Michael R. Dreeben is currently a high ranking paymaster in the Senior Executive Service (SES) shadow government. In fact, he is a member of the infamous SES 500 that makes compensation decisions for the entire organization—managed within the now evidently rogue U.S. Department of Justice.
Bruce Ohr is also a member of the SES 500 despite his assistance in fabricating the Steele “pee-pee” dossier and his collusion with the Queen’s Chief Crown Prosecutor Alison Saunders just four days before the infamous Trump Tower frame up. See AFI. (Mar. 21, 2019). British-American espionage-treason on full display at “Dinner with the Ohrs.” Americans for Innovation.
The other three U.S. Attorneys who argued U.S. v. Williams were Kenneth R. Starr, Robert S. Mueller, III, William C. Bryson along with Michael R. Dreeben.
U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL KENNETH STARR
Kenneth R. Starr is notoriously known for his legal convolutions in the Clinton Impeachment to make it fail. In other words, he protected Clinton. He ignored the decade of “Arkancide” involving the suspicous deaths of many dozens of former Clinton confidents. He sidestepped the mountains of evidence of criminality withheld by the Clintons at Ruby Ridge, Waco, the World Trade Center bombing, Kosovo, Rwanda, QRS-11 uninterruptable autopilot, Dual EC-DRBG algorithm FBI backdoor key, Whitewater, etc. Instead, Starr trivialized the proceedings to machinations about Bill’s sexcapades with intern-victim Monica Lewinsky.
FEDERAL CIRCUIT & FISA JUDGE WILLIAM C. BRYSON
William C. Bryson is currently a Federal Circuit judge. In other words, he hears all patent appeals where victims of SERCO’s British theft of U.S. inventions are left to flap in the wind of shadow government corruption. See AFI. (Apr. 20, 2018). The shadow government uses SES, Serco and OPIC as portals into horrific corruption. Americans for Innovation.
Bryson was nominated by Bill Clinton on Jun. 22, 1994, concurrently with his collusion with Starr, Mueller and Dreeben on the U.S. v. Williams decision to create a license to persecute victims of DoJ and Judiciary perfidy.
Tellingly, Bryson was a member of the FISA Courtfrom Dec. 01, 2011 to May 18, 2018. On Sep. 10, 2013, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. appointed Judge Williams C. Bryson to be the PRESIDING JUDGE of the FISA Court. Therefore, Bryson, Robert Mueller’s U.S. v. Williams collaborator, also presided over the FISA corruption surrounding the fabricated British intelligence agent Christopher Steele “pee-pee” dossier.
To be clear, Roberts appointed a Mueller man to be the presiding judge of the FISA Court who promoted the withholding of exculpatory evidence from a grand jury. Upon such corrupt men and women is our U.S. judiciary built. No wonder the FISA Court is a gutless wonder. It employs two-timing judges who exonerate the guilty, persecute the innocent and sell of our invention birthright to the British Privy Council.
Note: In the early 1990’s, James P. Chandler, III was a reviewer of patent cases and supposed critic of the Federal Circuit.
Now we return to Michael R. Dreeben. Dreeben’s associate Joseph C. Wyderko presided over the Oklahoma City bombing false flag cover-up.
Subsequently, Dreeben made sure that Joseph C. Wyderko kept the McVeigh secrets by ensuring that he and Wyderko was continuously assigned to DoJ prosecutions with Dreeben.
Then, Mueller appointed Dreeben, his old US v. Williams co-conspirator, to the Trump-Russia probe. With their fellow Williams partner Bryson, these criminals withhold exculpatory evidence in the Trump-Russia investigation, and are now trying to get away with it.
As insurance, Mueller cited US v. Williams in his Report. Is he sniggering: ‘Nah, nah, nah, nah, nah. Williams lets me withhold evidence suckers?’
GRAND JURIES (ALONG WITH THE DOJ, FEDERAL COURTS, USPTO) ARE CORRUPTED BEYOND REPAIR
These decades-long, incestuous DoJ, Judicial and Patent Office relationships that have created all this fetid case law are incontrovertible proofs that Robert Mueller and his ilk have corrupted at least the grand jury system beyond repair. See previous post AFI. (Apr. 17, 2019). Death of Mega Warlord Andrew Marshall Exposes 100-year NWO Patent Theft Agenda. Americans for Innovation.
Suggested Action Items from this investigation:
- The grand jury system must be eliminated forthwith.
- The DoJ special counsel procedure must be abolished.
- The FISA Court must be abolished.
- An attorney who becomes a legislator must forfeit his/her license to practice law subsequently (to being enriched by the laws he/she makes).
- Impeach John Roberts for his conspiratorial mismanagement of the FISA Court and compromise of the patent system to the British.
- Attorneys must be prohibited from using laws and precedents in their defense that they helped create.
- The Senior Executive Services (SES) must be abolished as nothing but a shadow government Fifth column menace to the Republic
- The U.S. Patent Office must be rebuilt without the British (SERCO, Crown Agents) and without attorneys on staff.
- The above are good first steps to restoring our Republic.